(July 13, 2012 at 5:28 am)Gambit Wrote: Drich, unless you can prove there were ever demon babies you are simply making weak excuses to defend that which is indefensible.
Seriously? So you are willing to use the bible to establish their was a flood, (One that you claim their is no evidence for) Yet you refuse to use the very same bible to establish the reason for the Flood.Are you pretending to be... Onstinate? or are you seriously this... Obstinate and did not understand the paradox in logic you just created for yourself.
Quote:You're basically using the argument of "They would have grown up evil, in a fallen world.", and preempting the response, "But if God had taken the babies away and saved them they wouldn't have been influenced by the evil adults.", and then tweaking it to fit by adding that the babies were demons, so they had to be slaughtered. Don't you ever once question how many allowances you have to make for your God? Actually, I don't even want to hear your answer because I know it's just going to be more mental gymnastics.Appearently you consider 'logical thought' to be too much of an acrobatic excersize. So their is nothing more for me to say to you untill you clean up this 'challenge.'
