RE: Pat Robertson says it's ok to ignore parts of the Bible.
July 13, 2012 at 3:43 pm
(This post was last modified: July 13, 2012 at 3:44 pm by Drich.)
(July 13, 2012 at 1:57 pm)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: Your equivocations at Brian are the red herring.Which ones? Everything stated directly answers a question HE ASKS!
Quote:Exo 21, as you acknowledge below, dumbass. In the same supposed conversation as the 10 commandments, right after them.I quoted the whole fucking thing earlier in this thread. Large bold print with bright red highlights so that only a drooling idiot could possibly fail to miss it.So?
It is dead on point with the OP, with Robertson's waffling, and with your absolutist assertion of what you call "gawd's law" vs. changing attitudes of men.[/quote]
I'll say it simple AGAIN because it seems you missed the first dozen or so times. What God identifies as slavery and what we know to be slaver are two different things. Robertson is condemed in a link I left for say this very thing!
The OP's clip was edited short to take a portion of what robertson said out of context to support an unsubstanited conclusion. This conclusion I identified in the first page or so as being slanderous as robertson did not say anything that the OP orginally reported, or was supposedly had been recorded as saying.
Quote:YOU ARE TRYING TO AVOID AT ALL COSTS THAT YOUR GOD ENDORSES KIDNAPPING HUMANS AND SELLING THEM INTO SLAVERY, AND A MAN SELLING HIS DAUGHTER INTO SLAVERY.So what? I am the one saying that not all slavery is bad. That means for me if God allows a provision for selling your daughter and you are an OT Jew who wants to sell your daughter then by all means sell your daughter with God's and (what it's worth) my blessings!!!!
Quote:Your fairy tale monster is a scumbag. As are you for endorsing him and endorsing slavery.YES! For I have said 1000 times now. Not all slavery is bad all of the Time!!!!!!!!![b] WE LIVE IN A SOCEITY BUILT ON SLAVE LABOR!!! MODERN DAY SLAVES! My post to Brian and to you listed several examples. but it seems you are more intrested in you next responce than reading what was written to you. Which is why i ignored you on the .com version of this web site. I do not have the time to waist on people who do you read what was carfully written to them.
You seem to be about 6 pages behind everyone else (like always) Maybe ask one of your peers to help you catch up.
