So I've been getting into discussions lately about abiogenesis and how it either does or does not make sense. During one of my discussions, this link was brought up.
http://www.trueorigin.org/abio.asp
I was dubious of the article...since it was basically written by a creationist. HOWEVER, it's not a young-earth creationist and he does not go into creationist talk. It's basically a refutation on abiogenesis.
Currently, I am unsure of where I stand on it. It seems to be put together rather well but I can't help but feel like there's a few instances of jumping to conclusions. I want you guys' and girls' opinions on this, and if possible, I'd like it if someone could counter-refute this, since I'm basically on the precipice of my ability to understand this stuff now.
http://www.trueorigin.org/abio.asp
I was dubious of the article...since it was basically written by a creationist. HOWEVER, it's not a young-earth creationist and he does not go into creationist talk. It's basically a refutation on abiogenesis.
Currently, I am unsure of where I stand on it. It seems to be put together rather well but I can't help but feel like there's a few instances of jumping to conclusions. I want you guys' and girls' opinions on this, and if possible, I'd like it if someone could counter-refute this, since I'm basically on the precipice of my ability to understand this stuff now.
