Where's the Justice?

[Drich]

Again, I quite clearly said: God is all powerful, God could have easily provided for the babies,

You really have a problem with reading, don't you?

again here is where you should have asked another question rather than assert what or How you think 'God would provide.' Now it is up to you and your interpertation of the bible to show How god is to provide for 10's of thousands of infants. with only 8 adults, 7 pairs of clean animals, and 1 pair of unclean animals.. Just know Any answer you give should result in a Rotf imoticon, but will save you the humilation to give you the honest oppertunity to explore your precept.

Yeah, but let them be born first because they need to die horribly in a flood before bringing them home, otherwise God wouldn't get his kicks. I say again, your God is an asshole.

You make a good point here. How is it you know of any Children being born that are not hybrids? For the only type of child the bible mentions are these hybrids. That is something i had not perviously noticed.

Translation: I don't have an answer, so I'm going to trot out "It's part of God's plan, man."

Ok let's see what you do with the oppertunity I gave you to answer.

This coming from the guy who is quite happy to pull the "We're discussing in the context of the bible" card, whenever it works in his favour. You're a sneaky little man, aren't you?

Ok you want an example of something foolish? this is one of many. For this is not a matter of simply contextual error. This is a matter of failed logic. as I've already pointed out. You have cherry picked one part of the flood story, (even though everything you believe says their wasn't a flood) you've ignored the rest of reference material that says their was flood, and substituted you own story as to what happened, just so you could try and convict god and his followers. again this is not so much as a contextual error as you rewritting the bible to persecute the Whole of Christianity and the God of the bible. So then it become you 'moral obligation' to distance yourself from God and His followers.

Oh, but isn't this the infallible word of God? So let me paint it in black and white for you. If your interpretation is wrong and the others are right, you're fucked and going to hell with the rest of us. I'll get the drinks in, I've set up a tab ahead of time.

were it that simple. For the same grace that is extended to those who willfully sin is extended to those who spend all of their ablity to find and worship God but come up short. For you see the command isn't to 'get things 100% right. it is to put in the 100% effort. If getting things 100% right was the goal we'd all be in trouble. Because the goal is to do your best is the reason we have so many different denominations. (I did a thread on this if you care to look it up)

The only display of pride here is you, and your insistence that all your interpretations of scriptures are correct and all others are incorrect.

Here is another place you should have asked a question. For incorrect is not damning someone else to hell. It simply means it is not biblically accurate.

You haven't pushed anything other than a collection of assertions which only serve to justify the abhorrent actions of the Christian God.

My work has not offered any commentary denoting the condemnation of the God of the bible. You simply have taken what was offered and filtered it through you failed morality to come to your own conclusion.

They're not even original either.

Of course they are not.

You didn't come by them through a relationship with the holy spirit, they are taught.

By whom? My atheist Father? My buddhist Mother? I was 26 before I went to my first formal bible study, and we only studied the NT.. Matter of fact I do not know that I have ever sat through an OT bible study ever. so please tell me who and how it was i was taught.

So you sit there, feeling proud that you have been given insider knowledge.

There is nothing inside here it is all written on the page! wasn't it you who requested to know where the story was orginally recorded? This is another FOOLISH statement! How is it you think you have a better understanding of the evens of the flood and NOt even have read or know where to find the account of the Ark? Than some on who has? If you give it an honest read and put aside your own version you would have the same information I have now!

The reason what I said sounds familiar to you is perhaps the last guy who argued with you also simply READ THE ACCOUNT AS WRITTEN. The Reason you are having so much trouble understanding what is going on and the reason your logic has failed is because your throwing your version against what God saw fit to have printed. You are going against God here. I am just a parrot repeating what He has already said.