Where's the Justice?

[Gambit]

again here is where you should have asked another question rather than assert what or How you think 'God would provide.' Now it is up to you and your interpertation of the bible to show How god is to provide for 10's of thousands of infants. with only 8 adults, 7 pairs of clean animals, and 1 pair of unclean animals.. Just know Any answer you give should result in a Rotf imoticon, but will save you the humilation to give you the honest oppertunity to explore your precept.

Again, this is where you fail to recognize the supposed all powerful nature of you God. If he saw fit to construct a flood that wiped out the world, he can sure as hell provide food and protection for the babies rather than kill them. What is so hard to understand that I have to literally spell it out for you?

You make a good point here. How is it you know of any Children being born that are not hybrids? For the only type of child the bible mentions are these hybrids. That is something i had not perviously noticed.

Ok... I'll leave you to look into that.

Ok let's see what you do with the oppertunity I gave you to answer.

I honestly have no idea what you are alluding to here, so I'll have to pass.

Ok you want an example of something foolish? this is one of many. For this is not a matter of simply contextual error. This is a matter of failed logic. as I've already pointed out. You have cherry picked one part of the flood story, (even though everything you believe says their wasn't a flood) you've ignored the rest of reference material that says their was flood, and substituted you own story as to what happened, just so you could try and convict god and his followers. again this is not so much as a contextual error as you rewritting the bible to persecute the Whole of Christianity and the God of the bible. So then it become you 'moral obligation' to distance yourself from God and His followers.

Please direct me to where I created any story or rewrote anything. Otherwise all you have is a strawman of what I actually said.

were it that simple. For the same grace that is extended to those who willfully sin is extended to those who spend all of their ablity to find and worship God but come up short. For you see the command isn't to 'get things 100% right. it is to put in the 100% effort. If getting things 100% right was the goal we'd all be in trouble. Because the goal is to do your best is the reason we have so many different denominations. (I did a thread on this if you care to look it up)

Great, then I'm going to heaven then.

Here is another place you should have asked a question. For incorrect is not damning someone else to hell. It simply means it is not biblically accurate.

If you are not biblical accurate then you have no place to speak on behalf of or claim to know the mind of the Christian God. You are slowly starting to agree with me, and you don't even know it.

My work has not offered any commentary denoting the condemnation of the God of the bible. You simply have taken what was offered and filtered it through you failed morality to come to your own conclusion.

That doesn't even make sense in the context of what I said. I can only assume that you are not capable of comprehending what I said or misinterpreted it, so I'll have to move on.

Of course they are not.

I'll answer this in my next response.

By whom? My atheist Father? My buddhist Mother? I was 26 before I went to my first formal bible study, and we only studied the NT.. Matter of fact I do not know that I have ever sat through an OT bible study ever. so please tell me who and how it was i was taught.

You have professes to studying the bible for over 10 years on another thread; going so far as to learn the original greek words etc. Now, unless I'm very much mistaken, God in the voice of Morgan Freeman did not narrate that shit to you.

There is nothing inside here it is all written on the page! wasn't it you who requested to know where the story was orginally recorded? This is another FOOLISH statement! How is it you think you have a better understanding of the evens of the flood and NOt even have read or know where to find the account of the Ark? Than some on who has? If you give it an honest read and put aside your own version you would have the same information I have now!

And I'd still think God is an asshole. FYI I have read it, but you could ask me the same questions about parts of Lord of the Rings, which I read around the same time, and I'd struggle to give you an accurate recollection of the order of events. You're the one making the positive claims about God's reasons for the flood, I am simply challenging them as you present them. Hence the reason I ask for reference material.

The reason what I said sounds familiar to you is perhaps the last guy who argued with you also simply READ THE ACCOUNT AS WRITTEN. The Reason you are having so much trouble understanding what is going on and the reason your logic has failed is because your throwing your version against what God saw fit to have printed. You are going against God here. I am just a parrot repeating what He has already said.

Nope. The reason is that you use the same reference material. Anyway, I really am done with this discussion because it is getting tiresome watching you try to mock me when you are clearly incapable of understanding the most simple statements. Trying to make me feel stupid is quite funny too, but I'll let you figure out why that is. Let's just say I'm really seeing red right now.