Where's the Justice?

[Drich]

Again, this is where you fail to recognize the supposed all powerful nature of you God.

Which is why I have asked you to provide some sort of precedent in which God is careing for 10's of thousands of infants. If I failed to recognize this then by all means show me.

If he saw fit to construct a flood that wiped out the world, he can sure as hell provide food and protection for the babies rather than kill them.

He did in that He called them home, where He is personally caring for them. (this is my arguement, where is yours?)

Ok... I'll leave you to look into that.

I did and I told you that the bible only mentions that Hybrids were being born. Now you claim that human babies were being born so it is your turn to provide that proof.

Ok you want an example of something foolish? this is one of many. For this is not a matter of simply contextual error. This is a matter of failed logic. as I've already pointed out. You have cherry picked one part of the flood story, (even though everything you believe says their wasn't a flood) you've ignored the rest of reference material that says their was flood, and substituted you own story as to what happened, just so you could try and convict god and his followers. again this is not so much as a contextual error as you rewritting the bible to persecute the Whole of Christianity and the God of the bible. So then it become you 'moral obligation' to distance yourself from God and His followers.

Please direct me to where I created any story or rewrote anything. Otherwise all you have is a strawman of what I actually said.

You said God destroyed innocent babies. I pointed out that the bible only records Hybrids being born... So unless you can find book chapter and verse that says otherwise, you are making up a story in order to persecute God and his followers.

Great, then I'm going to heaven then.

That is between you and God.

If you are not biblical accurate then you have no place to speak on behalf of or claim to know the mind of the Christian God.

I am absolutly in a position to speak on the recorded aspects of the nature and mind of God.

You are slowly starting to agree with me, and you don't even know it.

You are right in the fact that there is a change happening here just not correct in the direction of said change is happening.

You have professes to studying the bible for over 10 years on another thread; going so far as to learn the original greek words etc. Now, unless I'm very much mistaken, God in the voice of Morgan Freeman did not narrate that shit to you.

No you are right, Morgan freeman's voice was not used. Just FYI The 'Greek' is the language of the NT. The OT was/is perserved in the Hebrew. The story of Noah's Ark is found in the OT.

And I'd still think God is an asshole. FYI I have read it, but you could ask me the same questions about parts of Lord of the Rings, which I read around the same time, and I'd struggle to give you an accurate recollection of the order of events. You're the one making the positive claims about God's reasons for the flood, I am simply challenging them as you present them. Hence the reason I ask for reference material.

This is what i meant about foolish responses. Why in the world would you take on this challenge with out reading what it was you are challenging? How could you possiably hope to understand what is being communicated? I read the three chapters that contained this account and I am still learning things. How foolish is it to think you have even a working understanding of what is going on if you've never studied this account let alone haven't even taken the time to read it in 10 years time?

Nope. The reason is that you use the same reference material.

YES THAT REFERENCE MATERIAL IS CALLED THE BIBLE!!!

Anyway, I really am done with this discussion because it is getting tiresome watching you try to mock me when you are clearly incapable of understanding the most simple statements. Trying to make me feel stupid is quite funny too, but I'll let you figure out why that is. Let's just say I'm really seeing red right now.

I am not trying to provoke you to anger. I am trying to raise the bar in this discussion, by showing you your deficencies and logical errors. the way I am doing it is on you, and how you approach me. If you like for a more civial tone then try and be a little more respectful. Do not dictate terms or insist/persume on your knoweledge of me, of the bible or of God. Ask Questions Rather than make Declerations, or insult.

I honestly do look forward to your other Questions I promise to start fresh, and not let anything from here carry over.