I thought Sutherland's group put an end to that question. (Evidently proof isn't enough evidence for fundies.) They didn't show how abiogenesis did occur, but they showed one way that it could have occurred. And if it could have, the claim that it couldn't have is just another gap that Gawd doesn't live in. "Evolution is just a theory" is good science compared to "abiogenesis can't happen".
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 5, 2025, 9:53 am
Thread Rating:
Abiogenesis: Impossible, or no?
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Abiogenesis: Impossible, or no? - by Creed of Heresy - July 14, 2012 at 12:56 pm
RE: Abiogenesis: Impossible, or no? - by Minimalist - July 14, 2012 at 1:16 pm
RE: Abiogenesis: Impossible, or no? - by Anomalocaris - July 14, 2012 at 1:31 pm
RE: Abiogenesis: Impossible, or no? - by Creed of Heresy - July 14, 2012 at 2:51 pm
RE: Abiogenesis: Impossible, or no? - by Ben Davis - July 14, 2012 at 1:32 pm
RE: Abiogenesis: Impossible, or no? - by Cato - July 14, 2012 at 2:53 pm
RE: Abiogenesis: Impossible, or no? - by Creed of Heresy - July 15, 2012 at 1:42 pm
RE: Abiogenesis: Impossible, or no? - by downbeatplumb - July 15, 2012 at 2:17 pm
RE: Abiogenesis: Impossible, or no? - by Colanth - July 16, 2012 at 11:28 pm
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)