RE: The argument against "evil", theists please come to the defense.
July 19, 2012 at 7:33 am
(This post was last modified: July 19, 2012 at 7:39 am by FallentoReason.)
(July 19, 2012 at 4:57 am)genkaus Wrote:Hence why I said theologically(July 19, 2012 at 4:40 am)FallentoReason Wrote: As a former Christian, I used to say to this that Epicurus lived before the time of Jesus. God was willing to an extent to do something about it, hence why he sent Jesus. Do you think this is theologically satisfactory?
Nope, especially since a) he didn't send Jesus from the start
Quote:and b) Jesus failed.
I take it as a non-believer this is obviously your view because the Bible simply fails. Yes... I agree, but I was merely talking hypothetically/theologically. Learn to think outside the box a little

(July 19, 2012 at 4:59 am)padraic Wrote:Quote: God was willing to an extent to do something about it, hence why he sent Jesus.
Really.-
Quote:Do you think this is theologically satisfactory?
Theology is intellectual masturbation. RATIONALLY, the argument is nonsense:
Human society lived and suffered for thousands of years before Jesus. What took God so long? Why to this day,does this help,um not help so as I've noticed,and such a small proportion of humanity? Why does evil and suffering still exist,on a massive scale,even among the most devout and innocent?
They're all really good questions. I never went beyond my initial argument because my 'opponent' would get stumped after I said God sent Jesus. Mind you, these people were some non-Christian friends I had who don't have debating experience.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle