Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 4, 2024, 3:57 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tech Q&A - The Internet
#10
RE: Tech Q&A - The Internet
(July 28, 2012 at 7:07 pm)Tiberius Wrote:
(July 28, 2012 at 12:03 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: What do tier 1 peering policies look like these days and what boxes are they using for it?
You'd probably have to ask a major ISP. It's honestly not something I've really looked into.

Fair enough. It’s been more than a decade since I cared about peering myself. Once upon a time though I was a senior network engineer for NASA. Among other interesting projects I deployed the hardware we used for peering with the tier 1’s when we transitioned our voice network off the PSTN onto the Internet.

Settlement free peering is nice because it is free. But the Internet has changed a lot in the last 10 years, and I suspected that these days tier 1’s only participate in settlement free peering with their tier 1 peers. Makes since when you think about it. Turns out I was right.

AT&T’s settlement free peering requirements in the US are:

Quote: US Peering Requirements - AS7018
• A peer of AS7018 must operate a US-wide IP backbone whose links are primarily OC192 (10 Gbps) or greater.
• Peer must meet AT&T at a minimum of three mutually agreeable geographically diverse points in the US. The US interconnection points must include at least one city on the US east coast, one in the central region, and one on the US west coast, and must currently be chosen from AT&T peering points in the following list of metropolitan areas: New York City/Newark NJ, Washington DC/Ashburn VA, Atlanta, Miami, Chicago, Dallas, Seattle, San Francisco/San Jose, and Los Angeles.
• In addition a peer of AS7018 must interconnect in two mutual non-US peering locations on distinct continents where peer has a non-trivial backbone network. These non-US peerings will be with AT&T's regional AS only.
• Peer's traffic to/from AS 7018 must be on-net only and must amount to an average of at least 7 Gbps in the dominant direction to/from AT&T in the US during the busiest hour of the month.
• Interconnection bandwidth must be at least 10 Gbps at each US interconnection point.
• A network (ASN) that is a customer of AS 7018 for any dedicated IP services may not simultaneously be a settlement-free peer.
• Peer must have a professionally managed 24x7 NOC. Peer must agree to repair or otherwise remedy any problems within a reasonable timeframe. Peer must also agree to actively cooperate to resolve security incidents, denial of service attacks, and other operational problems.
• Peer must maintain a balanced traffic ratio between its network and AT&T. In particular, a new peer must have: a. No more than a 2.00:1 ratio of traffic into AT&T: out of AT&T, on average each month. b. A reasonably low peak-to-average ratio.
• Existing peers whose in: out ratio rises above 2.00:1 will be expected to work with AT&T to implement best-exit routing or to take other suitable actions to balance transport costs.
• Peer must abide by the following routing policy:
a. Peer must use the same peering AS at each US interconnection point and must announce a consistent set of routes at each point, unless otherwise mutually agreed.
b. No transit or third party routes are to be announced; all routes exchanged must be peer's and peer's customers' routes.
c. Peer must filter route announcements from its customers by prefix.
d. Neither party shall abuse the peering relationship by engaging in activities such as but not limited to: pointing a default route at the other or otherwise forwarding traffic for destinations not explicitly advertised, resetting next-hop, selling or giving next-hop to others.
• Peer must be financially stable.

Verizon's requirements are similar if a little more stringent. Their in/out ratio is set to 1.8 to 1.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
[Image: JUkLw58.gif]
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Tech Q&A - The Internet - by Tiberius - July 28, 2012 at 8:39 am
RE: Tech Q&A - The Internet - by Napoléon - July 28, 2012 at 8:52 am
RE: Tech Q&A - The Internet - by Tiberius - July 28, 2012 at 9:04 am
RE: Tech Q&A - The Internet - by Darth - July 28, 2012 at 10:19 am
RE: Tech Q&A - The Internet - by orogenicman - July 28, 2012 at 10:34 am
RE: Tech Q&A - The Internet - by Tiberius - July 28, 2012 at 11:13 am
RE: Tech Q&A - The Internet - by orogenicman - July 28, 2012 at 11:23 am
RE: Tech Q&A - The Internet - by popeyespappy - July 28, 2012 at 12:03 pm
RE: Tech Q&A - The Internet - by Tiberius - July 28, 2012 at 7:07 pm
RE: Tech Q&A - The Internet - by popeyespappy - July 28, 2012 at 9:42 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What would happen to the Internet if there were no regulation? FlatAssembler 7 454 January 27, 2024 at 2:56 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Will quantum computers slow our Internet down? FlatAssembler 5 605 November 16, 2023 at 3:42 pm
Last Post: Ravenshire
  Official World of Tech Foxaèr 7 734 October 27, 2023 at 11:22 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Need info on Internet connection when even cell phone service is iffy arewethereyet 10 1048 February 24, 2023 at 11:13 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Ermagerd not Internet Explorer! Rhizomorph13 18 1558 April 6, 2021 at 8:51 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Opinions on "fiber optic" internet? Gawdzilla Sama 31 2215 February 19, 2019 at 6:00 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Internet Speed 2018 Iroscato 20 2749 April 19, 2018 at 5:46 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Internet Browser paulpablo 14 1995 May 2, 2017 at 3:48 am
Last Post: Sal
  Iran rolls out domestic internet account_inactive 6 1671 August 30, 2016 at 2:00 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Internet speed, 2015 bennyboy 128 17887 April 22, 2016 at 10:06 am
Last Post: account_inactive



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)