(August 2, 2012 at 8:20 am)Napoleon Wrote:(August 1, 2012 at 7:44 pm)catfish Wrote: It means: "You can believe any individual you want. Or you can make up your own mind."
I don't see how this is at all relevant to the topic of the thread. This is a separate thing altogether. I've already said "let's assume christianity to be true" for arguments sake. I'm asking you a question regarding a certain problem I see arising if this were the case, nothing more, nothing less.
I answered your question, you then used someone else's version of "you have to believe in him" argument.
(August 2, 2012 at 8:20 am)Napoleon Wrote:catfish Wrote:I try my best to never tell someone they're wrong unless they make claims about me.
Aside from that being completely stupid. So what.
you said: " So what do you say to that? Simply that they are wrong?"
I answered your stupid question...
(August 2, 2012 at 8:20 am)Napoleon Wrote:Quote:However, if you wish to play the role of devil's advocate, play the part of a Christian and I'll do my best to give you an example of how to deal with their exclusionary doctrine.
I've asked my questions in the OP, either read it and provide an answer or piss off wasting time.
I've provided you with an answer. Just because you didn't like it or couldn't understand it doesn't change the fact that I gave you one.