Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 20, 2025, 3:10 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Theory of Evolution is about to change a bit
#25
RE: Theory of Evolution is about to change a bit



"What a bunch of Hooey."

"It was not until some weeks later that I realized there is no need to restrict oneself to 2 by 2 matrices. One could go on to 4 by 4 matrices, and the problem is then easily soluable. In retrospect, it seems strange that one can be so much held up over such an elementary point. The resulting wave equation for the electron turned out to be very successful. It led to correct values for the spin and the magnetic moment. This was quite unexpected. The work all followed from a study of pretty mathematics, without any thought being given to these physical properties of the electron."

P.A.M. Dirac


Science doesn't so much follow the metaphysics as it follows the mathematics. The last century of science has repeatedly shown that metaphysics is a poor guide to reality. The metaphysics of quantum theory is secondary to the mathematics, and the current incarnation of T.O.E.'s is almost wholly driven by the mathematics. The idea that metaphysics is the point guard for science is ridiculous. This also explains your mystery about Einstein and black holes: the mathematics of Einstein's model predicted them. He didn't just pull it out of his ass. (And a quick check of Wikipedia indicates it wasn't even his ass — Karl Schwarzschild derived a solution to Einstein's equations for a point mass which was refined over time by several physicists until it was recognized for what it was; again, the mathematics drove the discovery. Metaphysics played almost no role whatsoever.) And if there hadn't been an Einstein, somebody else would have discovered relativity, because the conflict between Maxwell's equations and the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment were lying there on the surface, just waiting for someone to reconcile them.

And we've already noticed your inability to distinguish between theory (evolution) and the data that supports it (physical and biological specimens). I'm guessing you're more open to divergent ideas because you lack the discrimination to separate the wheat from the chaff.


"We tend to scoff at the beliefs of the ancients. But we can't scoff at them personally, to their faces, and this is what annoys me."

Jack Handey


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Theory of Evolution is about to change a bit - by Ace Otana - September 10, 2012 at 4:39 am
RE: Theory of Evolution is about to change a bit - by Angrboda - August 12, 2012 at 4:39 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Star Trek theory Won2blv 10 2748 June 24, 2023 at 6:53 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  I am so sick of climate change deniers. Brian37 34 5664 November 23, 2020 at 9:30 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Can we recover from human caused climate change? Aroura 27 9552 November 23, 2020 at 12:27 pm
Last Post: Peebothuhlu
  Climate Change and ecological collapse ph445 42 12015 August 3, 2017 at 1:55 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Simulation Theory according to Dilbert Neo-Scholastic 110 21332 May 10, 2017 at 12:06 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Various ways of fighting climate change dyresand 15 4620 April 1, 2017 at 5:26 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Intelligent Design as a scientific theory? SuperSentient 26 7857 March 26, 2017 at 11:07 pm
Last Post: SuperSentient
  When religion is at odds with climate change research Aegon 24 4287 December 28, 2016 at 1:51 pm
Last Post: Secular Elf
  Simulation Theory Documentary Neo-Scholastic 25 7073 August 30, 2016 at 3:45 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Will modern society slow the progress of change? Heat 11 3526 May 10, 2016 at 1:52 am
Last Post: Excited Penguin



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)