Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 3, 2026, 7:34 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Faith, Hope and Love - the pillars of destruction?
#16
RE: Faith, Hope and Love - the pillars of destruction?
Quote:True, with the exception of deductive reasoning, which does dictate.


Ah, the famous Sherlock Holmes drivel. (remove the impossible and what remains is the truth) Deductive reasoning guarantees nothing


Logic does NOT guarantee truth. In formal logic, the premise is assumed to be true for the sake of argument. A logical inference may be claimed to be true IF AND ONLY IF the premise been proved to be true.


Hence, I argue that God cannot be argued into or out of existence. I demand that any truth claim be supported by evidence. If it cannot be,the best I can do is to accept degrees of plausibility/likelihood.

EG; I do not believe in gods,and consider the likelihood of their existence remote,based on an absence of credible evidence. Nor do I believe in the soul, an afterlife,angels,demons, the paranormal,alien visitation, dragons,mountain trolls or fairies living at the bottom of my garden,for the same reason.

PS When people speak of 'logic' it is to deductive logic they refer.It has even been argued that the simplest form of deductive logic, the syllogism, is the basis of western thought.


Quote:Remember: There is a difference between asserting that a premise is untrue, and asserting
that the logic of the argument is faulty. “All dogs can fly. Fido is a dog. Fido can fly.” That
is a perfectly valid argument in terms of logic, but this flawless logic is based on an untrue
premise. If a person accepts the major and minor premises of an argument, the conclusion
follows undeniably by the sheer force of reason. If in an argument, the logic reaches a
conclusion that seems absurd, it behooves you to analyze each sentence separately (to see if
each premise is true without exception) and then to analyze the structure of the argument
(to see if the reasoning of the argument itself is valid). Also be on the lookout for
“equivocation,” the use of two different meanings of one word during the process of an
argument.


http://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/documents/Syllogisms.pdf
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Faith, Hope and Love - the pillars of destruction? - by padraic - August 14, 2012 at 7:41 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Destruction of self confidence debunk_pls 50 13142 November 19, 2021 at 5:46 pm
Last Post: emjay
  A question for theists Part V - A new hope dyresand 12 6450 November 14, 2015 at 8:02 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  In Christianity, blind faith is good faith Rwandrall 43 22328 May 16, 2015 at 1:39 pm
Last Post: Nope
  Christian "faith" vs. plain "faith" watchamadoodle 112 32571 March 28, 2015 at 11:57 am
Last Post: Esquilax
  And we have a winner: The One True Faith vorlon13 4 2556 December 19, 2014 at 11:30 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  Why i'm not a Christian and why i left the faith as a child. dyresand 20 9111 November 8, 2014 at 10:01 am
Last Post: dyresand
  Hope For Our Resident Jesus Freaks? Minimalist 2 1897 September 29, 2014 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Faith and Works Mudhammam 25 7532 September 7, 2014 at 10:24 am
Last Post: Mudhammam
  you have to have faith..and there's a purpose k2490 16 8562 June 1, 2014 at 8:04 pm
Last Post: KUSA
  Faith, Hope & Love? ronedee 60 23839 August 26, 2013 at 3:59 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)