(August 16, 2012 at 8:08 am)Jaysyn Wrote: You think Capitan Christian up there gives a shit about facts? This is his team you're talking about, he's going to root for them no matter how horrible they'd be for women & this country in general.
Romney could have personally closed the company Clive works for & Ryan could have personally denied him unemployment insurance & he'd still be rimming them both.
Except he wouldn't, because that would be an abomination. Like shellfish & polyester blends.
I care about facts. For example, the fact that the article linked didn't mention any bills that Ryan or Romney actually voted on. Ryan's essay that the article links--you read that, right?--doesn't discuss cases of rape. So I think the article's inference is unfounded (though not necessarily untrue).
Let's be reasonable people, shall we? Just forget which parties we plan on voting for, and let's try to answer this question:
Under Ryan's "sanctity of human life" act, would a rapist be able to sue his victim in order to prevent her from aborting the fetus?
Now, what is relevant to this question: (Not necessarily exhaustive)
1) The language of the "sanctity of human life" act
Things that are not relevant to this question: (Not necessarily exhaustive)
1) Whether CliveStaples likes Paul Ryan or Mitt Romney.
2) Obama's birth certificate.
3) Bain Capital.
4) Whether the "sanctity of human life" act is good policy
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”
