RE: Olympics
August 16, 2012 at 1:27 pm
(This post was last modified: August 16, 2012 at 2:25 pm by jonb.)
(August 16, 2012 at 7:37 am)Tiberius Wrote:Ok lets do this one at a time shall we. I will deal with 1 first. We can deal with other things in latter posts.(August 16, 2012 at 6:16 am)jonb Wrote: Stewards that were already working for some venues prior to the Olympics would have to work for free if they wanted to work for the Olympics. That is my claim is it not?No, it's not.
Your claims were:
1) The people working as stewards in venues had their jobs taken away for the duration.
2) The unemployed would have had their benefits removed if they did not volunteer.
These are the two original claims that I asked you to provide evidence for.
People working as stewards at lords are normally employed by lords and work there. true or false.
Was lords a provider of stewards for the Olympics? No evidence provided but I suppose I could look it up do you insist, or can we take that a read?
The companies providing staff for the Olympics stet up their own criteria,
for who would qualify to work at the events.
Therefore for the people working at lords, would not be able to work in the place they normally worked at unless they worked for free to qualify to be a steward at the games. In short where they would normally be employed for the period of the Olympics they did not work at that time at that venue, their normal employment was removed from them.
I wait.