Olympics

[Tiberius]

'Took over employment', yes right it I can see how easily that phrase can be misinterpreted so I would right that differently. And I apologise if it caused any confusion.
At the same time a part time worker may not have legal title, but on forums we are not restricted to legalese as such I stand by the statement 'the Olympics took the jobs away'. As if it was not for the presence of the Olympics the stewards in all probability would be working.

'Full time stewards', that is an interesting concept for a cricket ground, how could you steward without people to steward?
Sure there are senior staff responsible for the hiring and firing and management of staff And there is a head steward, but these are not really the stewards we are talking about are they?

I mean the term steward to cover people who steward, have you a different definition?

Great, so we've come down to you arguing semantics rather than just admitting you were plain wrong about your claim. This is not about legality; this is about your claim that the people who worked at Lords had their jobs taken away during the Olympics, which as I've demonstrated is not true.

Now we've sorted that claim out, how about your next one? Provide evidence for the claim that unemployed people who did not volunteer had their benefits taken away.