(August 17, 2012 at 8:16 pm)jonb Wrote: So they do not have the work for the duration then do they? The job is taken away.*sigh*
What part of this are you not getting? If Lords employs them based on events, and there aren't any events, they don't work. Are you arguing that their jobs get taken away every time Lords doesn't have an event on?
Face it; these people were hired to work for Lords at Lords events. The Olympics is not a Lords event (Lords is cricket, this was archery if I'm not mistaken), so there was no reason to hire them for it.
Seriously now. NEXT. There is no point arguing this one anymore; people reading this thread can easily see that you've provided no evidence for your claim, and of the little anecdotal evidence you did provide, I have easily refuted all of it against what you actually claimed. You are clearly not going to admit you were wrong with your initial claim, so what is the point of continuing this? Let's move to your next claim.
