RE: Paul Ryan
August 20, 2012 at 6:28 pm
(This post was last modified: August 20, 2012 at 6:29 pm by CliveStaples.)
(August 20, 2012 at 10:15 am)whateverist Wrote: Who to hell appointed you as arbiter of which question needs answering?
Nobody--least of all me. I simply pointed out that his post was unresponsive to the question I asked, which was whether Ryan's bill would allow a rapist to sue his victim to prevent an abortion.
He doesn't have to answer the question if he doesn't want to--but if he's going to quote my post, I'd hope that he'd say something responsive instead of irrelevant red herring nonsense.
Quote:Your sense of entitlement is overwhelming .. you pompous, effete, woman hating, bible thumping, little man.
...? Insult me all you like, it doesn't prove that Ryan's bill would allow a rapist to sue his victim to prevent an abortion. That your flaming is tolerated on this board reflects poorly on the administrators of this site.
(August 20, 2012 at 12:53 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: Simply a characterization is it? Are you saying it doesn't allow for such a thing?
Please, enlighten me with your highly complex understanding of the bill. :-)
The burden of proof is on the person making the claim; the claim here is that the bill authorizes a certain act. Until I see evidence supporting this claim, it carries no weight.
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”
