RE: Where did the Jesus myth come from?
August 26, 2012 at 11:46 pm
(This post was last modified: August 26, 2012 at 11:48 pm by Lion IRC.)
You have failed the challenge teaearlgreyhot.
Well, I asked you to prove your claim that I had committed a logical fallacy. And you went straight to someone elses posts. Look at me. I'm over here. HELLO!
But Atom didnt assert a fallacy either.
Nothing in this post suggests Jesus mythers are wrong SOLELY by virtue of the fact that they are in the minority. Atom said ''more solid ground''. He did not say I am "right''. There is no logical fallacy because there is no claim of necessary inference.
Nothing in this post suggests Jesus mythers are wrong SOLELY by virtue of the fact that they are in the minority.
Nothing in this post suggests Jesus mythers are wrong SOLELY by virtue of the fact that they are in the minority. It's a clap smiley.
Nothing in this post suggests Jesus mythers are wrong SOLELY by virtue of the fact that they are in the minority.
Nothing in this post suggests Jesus mythers are wrong SOLELY by virtue of the fact that they are in the minority. It certainly IS illogical to ignore the fact that they are experts and peers.
(August 25, 2012 at 11:37 pm)teaearlgreyhot Wrote:(August 25, 2012 at 11:37 pm)Lion IRC Wrote: Show me where I said...Jesus mythers are wrong SOLELY by virtue of the fact that they are in the minority.
Please be sure to use "quotation marks".
Can ya do that for me?
You made a claim. Now prove it. (Hint - use evidence)
Here's what Atom (whom you defended) said that really set me off:
Well, I asked you to prove your claim that I had committed a logical fallacy. And you went straight to someone elses posts. Look at me. I'm over here. HELLO!
But Atom didnt assert a fallacy either.
Quote:I think I'm on more solid ground appealing to a near unanimity of peer reviewed academic scholars on the testimony of Bart Ehrman as a hostile witness than you are citing yourself as your own authority.
Nothing in this post suggests Jesus mythers are wrong SOLELY by virtue of the fact that they are in the minority. Atom said ''more solid ground''. He did not say I am "right''. There is no logical fallacy because there is no claim of necessary inference.
Quote:Making the case for Jesus' historical existence is an involved topic that starts with the presentation of data supported by the academic consensus. If the significance or existence of the academic consensus on all such data is denied, there is no point in presenting more such data.
Nothing in this post suggests Jesus mythers are wrong SOLELY by virtue of the fact that they are in the minority.
Quote:
Nothing in this post suggests Jesus mythers are wrong SOLELY by virtue of the fact that they are in the minority. It's a clap smiley.
Quote:"Jesus mythers and holocaust deniers and fake moon landing folk are interesting and quaint."
Nothing in this post suggests Jesus mythers are wrong SOLELY by virtue of the fact that they are in the minority.
Quote:In fact, if 99% of experts on a given subject agreed, then ignoring that fact would make YOU the person acting illogically for rejecting their expertise.
Nothing in this post suggests Jesus mythers are wrong SOLELY by virtue of the fact that they are in the minority. It certainly IS illogical to ignore the fact that they are experts and peers.