(August 27, 2012 at 9:11 pm)FallentoReason Wrote: Any explanations for why the epistles don't seem support a human Christ yet, Atom?
Be careful - you're in danger of committing the "appeal to negative explanations" fallacy, along with the "non-supportive epistles" fallacy and the "Aunt Sally ate an ad hominem" fallacy.
"If there are gaps they are in our knowledge, not in things themselves." Chapman Cohen
"Shit-apples don't fall far from the shit-tree, Randy." Mr. Lahey
"Shit-apples don't fall far from the shit-tree, Randy." Mr. Lahey