Quote:Maybe it's time to teach you what your own Bible says.
Ephesians 3:4,5
4When you read this, you can perceive my insight into the mystery of Christ, 5which was not made known to the sons of men in other generations as it has now been revealed to his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit.
Galatians 1:11,12
11For I would have you know, brothers, that the gospel that was preached by me is not man's gospel. 12For I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ.
I've been trying to get an answer to this for a while but everyone dodges the question. Why are the early Christians talking about Jesus as if he was a spiritual being? Both these verses don't even bother mentioning his glorious 3 year ministry. Instead they collectively say the gospel came from no man but through the spirit. Oh really? That's an incredibly harsh thing to say after all that Jesus went through.
P.s. it would really help if you brought up real arguments instead if resorting to fallacies like appealing to authority and the masses. If you think that's good enough then how about this: the majority of the world doesn't believe in Christianity so you must be wrong.
Edit, you obviously haven't been a Christian before. Of course the gospel was written through the spirit.
The Following is what Christian's believe in, so don't give me any crap about whether it's true or not.
The people who wrote this books wrote it inspired by God's word. They took God's word and took it down. God is both the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. It's quite possible God put the Holy spirit in them and that made them write it or it could be referring to himself, since he technically is also the Spirit. God is technically Jesus too.
End
You gave two verses, there are hundreds supporting that he called himself the Son of God.
Your last statement just supports mine. Both Christian and non-Chrisitan scholars support that Jesus existed. The vast majority does, and they AREN'T stupid.
