Where did the Jesus myth come from?

[Atom]

I did. That's because it would never pass muster in a peer review. There are professional historians that have published peer reviewed articles that separately draw the conclusion that the resurrection occurred in their non peer reviewed publications.

That's the whole point of peer-review; to weed out bad or inconsistent science.

I think we are in agreement on this point. I tried to make this clear in my original comment on the topic. I support the use of the assumption of naturalism in historical analysis. Claims to have historical evidence for miracles and religious causes should be done separately, in my opinion.