RE: Reading the New Testament chronologically
September 5, 2012 at 12:57 pm
(This post was last modified: September 5, 2012 at 12:57 pm by Tea Earl Grey Hot.)
(September 5, 2012 at 10:48 am)FallentoReason Wrote:Undeceived Wrote:These aren't "date written," they are "date of the earliest copy." Christian scholars have reasons to believe Mark, or source Q, came first.
Uncovering the Markan Allegory II
There's significant reason to believe that's not the case.
Undeceived Wrote:These aren't "date written," they are "date of the earliest copy."As far as I know, the earliest Gospel fragment is that from John which dates to 125 C.E. (?).
Not sure where you got that idea from.
Warning: he's probably going to use that bogus 1st century Mark fragment that was touted earlier this year.
My ignore list
"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence."
-- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103).
"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence."
-- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103).
