RE: OK Christians. your chance. Convince me of God.
September 21, 2012 at 12:21 am
(This post was last modified: September 21, 2012 at 12:22 am by Mystic.)
Ok let's rework the premises:
If it's not from God (a) , people would find it much discrepancies (b).
People don't find in it much discrepancies (not b)
Therefore It's from God (not a)
Is that fine with you?
A -> B
Not B
Therefore not A.
When you say A ->B
B doesn't depend on A being true, but A depends on B being true.
B can be true without A being true. But A cannot be true, without B being true.
If it's not from God (a) , people would find it much discrepancies (b).
People don't find in it much discrepancies (not b)
Therefore It's from God (not a)
Is that fine with you?
A -> B
Not B
Therefore not A.
When you say A ->B
B doesn't depend on A being true, but A depends on B being true.
B can be true without A being true. But A cannot be true, without B being true.
