RE: OK Christians. your chance. Convince me of God.
September 21, 2012 at 12:46 am
(This post was last modified: September 21, 2012 at 12:48 am by Mystic.)
(September 21, 2012 at 12:43 am)Rhythm Wrote: Right, why indeed. Because for A to imply B you would have to -it has to be stated that A is the only sufficient condition for B, or else it doesn't follow. If it doesn't follow then it doesn't even matter if Not B (the next bit), is true, now does it?
You are talking non sense. A is not a condition for B. B is a condition for A. And it doesn't have to be the only condition for A.
B can be true regardless of A. But if B is not true, then A is definitely not true.
If A is true, however, then B is true. It doesn't mean B is dependent on A being true.
