Ok, I am curious. I am not sure if this is the best spot for this.
If Jesus has been established by the majority of scholars as a true character of history and that history also records that he was crucified for claiming to be the son of God.
Also as I understand it, as unreliable as any ancient text is, the Bible has been better preserved than all others.
Wouldn't that provide at least a starting point to examine further as 'a scrap of evidence' ?
If Jesus has been established by the majority of scholars as a true character of history and that history also records that he was crucified for claiming to be the son of God.
Also as I understand it, as unreliable as any ancient text is, the Bible has been better preserved than all others.
Wouldn't that provide at least a starting point to examine further as 'a scrap of evidence' ?