RE: Divine Inspiration
October 2, 2012 at 12:06 pm
(This post was last modified: October 2, 2012 at 12:06 pm by Darkstar.)
If they weren't really slaves, then why did god send terrible plagues in order to free them?
Drich Wrote:Quote:Is that really what you think atheists do, drink and whore their time away?That's what I did with my time as an atheist yes.
It annoys me when some people can't handle not having a big brother watching thm, so they assume that everyone else is like that. On the contrary, god will forgive you for almost anything if you just ask, whereas atheists can't find closure so easily. The short film (posted somewhere on this forum) called "Jesus: Madman or Worse" brings up the fact that being forgiven by god can serve as a replacement to forgiveness from the person you actualy wronged. If you didn't wrong anyone, then there is no need to ask for forgiveness (though many things that hurt no one are still called 'sins')
I'm not saying that you are selfish or self-indulging. What I am saying is that you prefer to be with god over self-indulgence, so, from what I understand, this drove you to christianity, despite the fact that it actually has no bearing on the validity of the religion itself.
I believe that this discussion has already been had earlier (maybe not on this thread). The general conclusion was that 20+ years of religion, and training + a desire to be a pastor weren't worth a mustard seed of faith.
Drich Wrote:It means God does not need for us to live out a life span to know who will choose Him. He knew what we would choose before we were created. Therefore our lives are for us to know what we would choose.
Well, if god already knows who will 'choose' him, then are you saying that god refuses to reveal himself to people who wouldn't follow anyway? Then what about all of the theistic satanists?
By your first sentence, you suggest that god could simply save those who would be faithful if they believed. Perhaps I interpreted you wrong, but it would make the most sense to do it that way, if he won't reveal himself to everyone.
Here's the problem: you assume that god must exist. If someone takes a more neutral stance and A/S/Ks for 20 years and finds nothing, then why is it unreasonable to assume that god does not exist? Those who are desperate to believe will see what they want to, the unbiased will end up not believeing.
How valid is a dream as a sign from god? How about this:http://atheistforums.org/thread-12234.ht...+in+heaven
Exactly, it is no less unbelieveable than anything else in the bible. I know that the story isn't about the logistics, but if the logistics fail, then the story is only a metaphor. The story never said that god gave any aid to Noah other than advance warning, so while the flood was an act of god, the ark and animal collecting were not.
Oh, and about evolution. It cancels creation because it implies a common ancestor, whereas creation says god made many different animals at the same time in their fully evolved (as to 3000 years ago)forms. (You can ignore this last part if you really want to...)
John Adams Wrote:The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.