RE: Divine Inspiration
October 6, 2012 at 11:35 pm
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2012 at 11:38 pm by Darkstar.)
There is nothing that can be substituted for morality as a standard.
You don't need to standardize morality as 'a lot' and 'a little'. You standardize it as immoral, moral, or questionable. God provides absolute moral standards and they fail miserably for that reason: they are not subject to change and therefore cannot be corrected.
God's self righteousness knows no bounds. All righteousness is god's self righteousness. If you think that you are incapable of differentiating between right and wrong, then it is your problem. I don't need god to tell me not to steal, or not to stone someone to death for picking up sticks on a Sunday...if it wasn't obvious: Numbers15:32-36
So having morals is sinful...we should just repent perpetually, rather than try to be good people because we will all eventually make at least one mistake in our lives.
Or they would say "forget this! Let's do whatever we want!" Treat someone like a monster for long enough and they start to act like one. How exactly do you suppose that turning away from the jealous god's self-righteousness is lowering the bar?
Here's the problem: by 'sinful' you mean imperfect. There are varying degrees of 'sinfulness', and lumping murderers in with the same group as social workers is unfair. Of course, you are convinced that the entire human race is garbage, and even more of garbage to dare think otherwise, so why bother debating this point with you?
God wields self-righteousness exclusively

I see now. You are so utterly incapable of questioning that you will always assume that god is just. How do you know god is not evil? You assume that he knows best. Even when he does morally reprehensible things, you move goalposts and say that we are morally reprehensible for questioning the ethics of stoning someone for picking up sticks on a Sunday. God is not just and he never was. He is the strongest, and therefore can impose his unjust will on humanity.
...what are you talking about!?! Are you saying that the jews wanted the holocaust?

Then explain why so many of them desperately tried to avoid dying.
Hitler was a roman catholic. The fact that he evoked the name of many gods wouldn't help your case. Also, what other god would he be doing the work of by killing jews other then the god of christianity, who says that all people of other religions must die?
It sounds like he knew of your 'vision', which would make it a self-fulfilling prophecy. Even if not, I don't know how this proves god. He didn't even say 'god told me to give you this money'.
I am wondering two things now:
1. If you admit it will never have meaning to me, then why use it in a debate? (Now, in this case I kind of prompted you to, so it's different).
2. If that happened to me, it wouldn't prove anything. Why does god only give individual proof? Again: Why does god value belief over worship and obedience. I won't obey something I don't believe exists, and there are atheists who wish god were real. Why won't he reveal himself? It is not our duty to play hide and seek with him, as it is a wild goose chase with no time limit if he doesn't exist, and yet could still take decades if he does. If we only have one life, I won't waste it searching for something that I don't believe exists.
You and god are both making unreasonable demands. You say we won't find evidence for him until after we have already convinced ourselves of him. Then we can let confirmation bias and credulity run rampant to our hearts content and find all of the personal 'proof' we need, while never finding any actual evidence.
I don't think you understand the point I'm making. What I'm saying is this:
1. The Peace Corps is a secular organization. Religion does not have a monopoly on helping Africa. In fact, I'd wager that their contibutions are smaller when compared with secular government aid.
2. If god gave us charge of the world and is letting the Africans starve, then why is he helping you, personally? I also don't know how you came to the conclusion that I don't care about starving Africans. Religion just isn't saving them.
Exactly my point. He makes "thou shall not kill" a commandment, while making breaking any of the top four commandments a killing offense. Remember the stick gaterer from earlier in the post?
[hide
Drich Wrote:[/hide]Quote:And I am supposed to assume that he had a good reason for going against his own will?Where did He go against His own will?
It seems you assume too much about God.
It seems you assume nothing other than 'he had his reasons'...which is assuming everything. If god is unknowable, then why do you constantly defend him? You don't know much about him, other than what can be inferred from his actions. Logically, one can infer that god is a monster, from his actions. You have the presupposed idea that he is always just, nullifying any argument against him.
Mark 4:10-12
Proof that if god exists he wants us to burn.


John Adams Wrote:The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.