(October 17, 2012 at 11:07 am)Tino Wrote:The simple evolutionary meme that a man cannot be outshined by a women. Our male species would rather pay more for men because it is a "guy" thing than anything else. EGO is what it amounts to.(October 17, 2012 at 10:17 am)Brian37 Wrote: If I a democratic stratigist, I would have tons of adds jumping on this dodge.
"I demanded women in my cabinet" meaning when Shit Romney was governor.
When asked in the debate if he supported equal pay all he had to say was "yes". He is a coward and dodged that. No one asked him if he had women working in his government, BECAUSE THAT WAS NOT THE FUCKING ISSUE.
He won't support equal pay for women in the private sector because he damned well knows that the private sector will look for the cheapest labor. Romney saying "I hired women" is like saying "I hired blacks"
HEY ASSHOLE, IT ISN'T ABOUT HIRING, it is about equal pay jackass. You wont support equal pay because big business wants cheap labor.
Obama however singed an executive order saying that women CAN sue if they find out if they have been getting the shaft after doing the same work.
Romeny only gives a shit about big business and this after convention act on his part is just that. It is unfortunate that swing voters, much like some sports fans, wont pay attention until the playoffs. But if most voters had been tracking Romney on a day by day basis, they would know he is a big fucking liar.
OK here's why I don't buy this. Let's say I'm a greedy businessman. Make that the greediest fucking businessman of all time. I don't give a shit about anything but money. Let's say I'm the biggest greediest fucking lying fucking republican fucking conservative pro-big-business anti-environment labor-abusing asshole you can possibly imagine. Now, your contention is that I can hire equally capable women for 80% the pay rate of equally capable men. Think about it for a minute - use your own common sense. What would that greedy fucking business man do? Answer - NEVER HIRE A MAN! Why would I pay 25% more for a man than an equally capable worker who happened to be female? Please explain this to me.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 20, 2024, 11:09 pm
Thread Rating:
Romney's dodge on equal pay.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Romney's dodge on equal pay. - by Brian37 - October 17, 2012 at 10:17 am
RE: Romney's dodge on equal pay. - by Tino - October 17, 2012 at 11:07 am
RE: Romney's dodge on equal pay. - by festive1 - October 17, 2012 at 12:41 pm
RE: Romney's dodge on equal pay. - by Annik - October 17, 2012 at 12:54 pm
RE: Romney's dodge on equal pay. - by CapnAwesome - October 17, 2012 at 2:39 pm
RE: Romney's dodge on equal pay. - by Brian37 - October 17, 2012 at 6:42 pm
RE: Romney's dodge on equal pay. - by Minimalist - October 17, 2012 at 11:20 am
RE: Romney's dodge on equal pay. - by festive1 - October 17, 2012 at 1:24 pm
RE: Romney's dodge on equal pay. - by Autumnlicious - October 17, 2012 at 4:46 pm
RE: Romney's dodge on equal pay. - by Minimalist - October 17, 2012 at 6:47 pm
RE: Romney's dodge on equal pay. - by Autumnlicious - October 17, 2012 at 6:57 pm
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)