RE: Failed Biblical Prophecies
October 19, 2012 at 11:54 am
(This post was last modified: October 19, 2012 at 11:58 am by Drich.)
(October 19, 2012 at 11:37 am)Darkstar Wrote: What 'reference material'? I provided two links of translations from Hebrew straight to English that do not say 'dispossesed' and you provided no links.No I cut and pasted from the strongs which is what your link is based on.http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H3423&t=KJV
So what would be the more accurate material to use? The lexicon based on what the orginal says or the orginal itself?
Quote: Here's something:http://biblelexicon.org/judges/1-19.htm
Quote:but could notOk, Do you remember the example I gave of Rome Occupying Israel? They "Yaw-rash" the Holy Land but could not drive out it's inhabitants till 70AD.
lo' (lo)
not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles (as follows)
drive out
yarash (yaw-rash')
to occupy (by driving out previous tenants, and possessing in their place); by implication, to seize, to rob, to inherit; also to expel, to impoverish, to ruin
Quote:This says that they couldn't drive them out has the same meaning as the driving out you spoke of before, as in they could not seize, rob or inherit. Note, this is the commentary you asked for, in leiu of a literal translation.I have not asked for a commentary I pointed out you are attacking actual reference material with commentary. Which is foolishness.
Quote:Just like we might see the rapture too, even though it is arguably uncanonical... And again, should I take your word for it, or will you show me the evidence, as I have done with the lexicon commentary page I gave above?Done:
http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexi...6547&t=KJV
did you honestly think I was making this up as I went? That I was not actually using a legit source material?
Anytime you want to compare 'notes' just ask and I will be glad to fill in the blanks with book chapter and verse or a link to a lexicon's defination.[/quote]
(October 19, 2012 at 11:44 am)FallentoReason Wrote:(October 19, 2012 at 11:36 am)Drich Wrote: Except for one distinct difference. One can yeild to X and find God, as God promised. while if one yeilds to the x of any of the other 3000+ gods mention they will find nothing.(October 19, 2012 at 11:36 am)Drich Wrote: Except for one distinct difference. One can yeild to X and find Sol Invictus, as Sol Invictus promised. while if one yeilds to the x of any of the other 3000+ gods mention they will find nothing.(October 19, 2012 at 11:36 am)Drich Wrote: Except for one distinct difference. One can yeild to X and find Ra, as Ra promised. while if one yeilds to the x of any of the other 3000+ gods mention they will find nothing.(October 19, 2012 at 11:36 am)Drich Wrote: Except for one distinct difference. One can yeild to X and find Dionysus, as Dionysus promised. while if one yeilds to the x of any of the other 3000+ gods mention they will find nothing.(October 19, 2012 at 11:36 am)Drich Wrote: Except for one distinct difference. One can yeild to X and find Ixchel, as Ixchel promised. while if one yeilds to the x of any of the other 3000+ gods mention they will find nothing.
Uh-oh.
only, one thing. where are these gods now? Where are the worshipers of these god now? Uh-Oh I guessed they died with the people who worshiped them did.. Which would lead me to believe them to be false gods.