(October 27, 2012 at 3:17 am)Darkstar Wrote: I think we've come to a standstill. Either you can acknowledge that the tyre of old (the submerged one) has been found, as the prophecy stated it never would be, or you can deny it. That doesn't change the facts. You say it was 'lost' becasue it wasn't found for 3000+ years, but the bible used the word never, as in even 3000 years is not long enough.
You are playing games with the word found I posted the Hebrew word and defination. You are taking a modern english defination and applying to a word that includes neuaunces that you have not accounted for.
Is this the only way you can win an arguement? What of the 'facts' you spoke of in my last thread, and how I was supposedly ignoring them??? Who is ignoring facts for the sake of his own faith about the status of a city that no one has literally seen for 3000 years?
Even if you honestly in your heart can not resolve whether or not Tyre has ever been found, you must admit that the rest of the prophesy is very specific and accurate.
