RE: The name of god
October 28, 2012 at 6:41 pm
(This post was last modified: October 28, 2012 at 6:45 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(October 28, 2012 at 5:30 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: [...]perfection is not possible logically.
Or maybe flaws are not possible logically?
Try this argument on for size: Objective perfection is the absence of objective flaws. It is not meaning itself, but rather an absence of the negative objective meaning of flaws. It is objective flawlessness. Since there is no objective flawlessness because there is no objective meaning in the world whatsoever, objective perfection's presence therefore exists due to an absence of objective flawlessness.
The problem is of course that perfection should probably mean more than just flawlessness. Perfect is often defined as "flawless" but a better definition is probably "absolutely good".