The fact of the matter is that god said Nebuchadnezzar would annhialate the city, and he did not. Alexander the great did, but it said Nebuchadnezzar eould do it. Why would god need to manipulate mortal armies when he could do it himself? If locating the city and excavating its harbor does not count as finding the city because the harbor is technically not the city former then I guess we're done here.
Same. Not only have I learned about the city, but I agree that if we cannot agree on the definition of 'found', then we might as well move on. As for another prophecy, how about the one saying that Jerusalem would never again be harmed...about a decade before its population was massacred and its two main temples destroyed by attackers.
Drich Wrote:Are their any other biblical prophecies that any of you want to discuss? Because the Tyre discussion has basically boiled down to a yeah-huh/Nut-uh arguement, I consider the matter closed. Again this does not mean you have to accept what i have said. There is just no where else for me to go with this conversation.
Same. Not only have I learned about the city, but I agree that if we cannot agree on the definition of 'found', then we might as well move on. As for another prophecy, how about the one saying that Jerusalem would never again be harmed...about a decade before its population was massacred and its two main temples destroyed by attackers.
