(October 26, 2012 at 8:25 pm)jonb Wrote: What on earth are you going on about?
Didn't you like me saying that bias is more general than just what is happening in academic science, and giving two examples of it?
No, I didn't like your conflation of the activities of a privately held organization (of which serves an audience that clearly endorses various -isms) and the larger, unrelated issue of women in the sciences.
Your conflation and confusion of disparate issues muddies up the primary topic.
(October 26, 2012 at 8:25 pm)jonb Wrote: Are you saying I should not give particular examples, but you can talk about your sister?
Show me something other than a study that screams "bias!" with some meaningful conclusions (as to how and why) than simply using said study and implying that the males are simply sexist.
(October 26, 2012 at 8:25 pm)jonb Wrote: But I accept your apology for gabbing a random numeric which you now admit did not mean anything.
I didn't apologize. Fuck you.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more