RE: A pantheistic argument.
October 29, 2012 at 6:06 pm
(This post was last modified: October 29, 2012 at 6:10 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(October 29, 2012 at 5:58 pm)Rhythm Wrote: 1: I'd say lets not assume that[...]
Well that is the required premise for my purpose for this thread. Why would you bother disagreeing/agreeing with me if you're not going to follow that?
Quote: [...] Why would influence qualify something for divinity?
I never defined god as divine.
Quote:The universe is probably, you know, "the universe" but if you want to redefine either concept so that they are interchangeable that's your call.
I am well aware that the universe is the universe, that's a tautology. I never said that god is the universe, I started with "let's assume[...]" and then showed that from that assumption it then followed that god is the universe.