Quote:Science doesn't cover it. You have to make a lot up to cover what religion and science combined cover. I have avery logical system. What do you have?
Science covers as much as it can cover. Religion covers everything because you assert that it is true regardless of lack of evidence. Religion covers everything but it is far from accurate. It's guess work.
Also it is not logical to believe in god. I assume you believe god is non-temporal.
Now I can easily say Santa is non-temporal and it was him who created everything and that he matches your god in everything. All loving, all knowing and all powerful. Now what if every imaginable character is non-temporal and have all the powers of your god but is god but with each character holding a unique personality. Could you disprove any of them? You can't. Believing in god is no more different from believing in any imaginable character. God is no different from any imaginable character unless evidence is found. Which is impossible because he is non-temporal and normally when the word "non-temporal" is used the debate should end. Since it's far beyond scientific observation or any other method of confirmation.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
