(October 29, 2012 at 3:39 pm)Drich Wrote: It's funny how for 13 pages the destruction of Tyre and how permanent it was, was of the paramount importance, but when the 'Failed bible prophecies.com' arguement fails itself 50 different ways, all of the sudden nothing being argued is of any real importance.
It never really was of any importance because we have only ever been humoring you. You're the only one arguing that the prophecy is legitimate because the rest of us know that prophecies are not real.
Quote:Now 'proof' is the bench mark.. Well, that is what a prophecy is. It's proof that the God one (Ezekiel) is repersenting is legit. (That is why your peers have been desperatly trying to proove the prophecy wrong.)
Nobody is trying to prove it wrong; there's no evidence that it is right.
You operate in a fantasy land where we must assume everything in that book is truth and that it is on our backs to disprove what is in there. In the real world, the onus is on you to certify its contents independent of the Bible, with evidence not derived from it.
Well, we know that the city of Tyre was wrecked. There is plenty of evidence this happened, and the Bible is only one piece of it. We have only the Bible to say that God was responsible for it. What almost certainly happened is that some slave of Yahweh decided, long after Tyre fell, to retcon history and insert his evil skydaddy into the narrative to terrorize his fellow slaves of Yahweh.