A pantheistic argument.

[Angrboda]

I haven't read the thread, so I don't know if it's been pointed out or not, but I found the Wikipedia entries for pantheism and panentheism fascinating. More than meets the eye.


(ChadWooters was a panentheist if I remember rightly, as was a recent drive-by spammer. The question of whether I am co-existent with God in the flesh or not, has some implications
for arguments from God's greatness. Can God be me and me still be me? If not, anything that I am, God is not, and diminishes him. If God is that than which there can be no greater,
logically everything must be God, or there is no God; everything God is not is something more it could be. [simplistically of course; more nuanced, adding me may not qualitatively improve
God, but that just points up the flaws in Godel's conception of the Ontological argument, which, I must confess surprises me for him. To paraphrase Elvis Costello, I guess it's true that
you never see the lies that you believe. [I believe Dennett makes similar errors of familiarity in his later work on free will; and Dennett and Godel are two of my heroes, at that])