At origin I was "B" - emotionally disinterested. (9/10 years old).
Much Later - I did see expression intention © or 'emotive'. As well as that I could accept the evidence wasn't good, but because I was emotionally disinterested I didn't really give it much weight. (A)
So I think I may have come to a conclusion: I'm a 'functioning non-cognitive' - I accept that the statement "God exists" must in fact be either true or false, but for practical purposes I don't treat it as such and certainly don't invest time in trying to argue 'the god hypothesis'.
Statements like "God must be treated as any hypothesis" are ones I reject functionally and inter personally - even though it's literally true or false - in the same way I would reject something like "There was 74 cents in change in my pocket the morning of December 1st, 1982". The statement "There was 74 cents in my pocket" must be true or false, but arguing it (as the proofs are lost) is not rational.
Much Later - I did see expression intention © or 'emotive'. As well as that I could accept the evidence wasn't good, but because I was emotionally disinterested I didn't really give it much weight. (A)
So I think I may have come to a conclusion: I'm a 'functioning non-cognitive' - I accept that the statement "God exists" must in fact be either true or false, but for practical purposes I don't treat it as such and certainly don't invest time in trying to argue 'the god hypothesis'.
Statements like "God must be treated as any hypothesis" are ones I reject functionally and inter personally - even though it's literally true or false - in the same way I would reject something like "There was 74 cents in change in my pocket the morning of December 1st, 1982". The statement "There was 74 cents in my pocket" must be true or false, but arguing it (as the proofs are lost) is not rational.
