RE: Hell, or rather my brief experience of it.
November 13, 2012 at 8:53 pm
(This post was last modified: November 13, 2012 at 8:57 pm by Darkstar.)
(November 13, 2012 at 2:33 pm)Drich Wrote:
"We were literally designed to be loves that way" Does it say that in the bible?
Drich Wrote:Darkstar Wrote:I guess that "a lot" of study can be done in twenty minutes, because I rejected the cavernlike hell in favor of a place of pure fire (whether metaphorical for pain or not) after about that much research on the subject. (Note that said reseacrh and conclusion occurred prior to this thread)Where the time spent comes in is that you have to reconsile the two descriptions of Hell. What the Jews were given to understand is Just as True as what Christianity was told of hell. On the surface these two contradict.
I don't think that the Christian hell has been described in cave form in the bible. Please show me the verse containing this description if I am wrong.
Drich Wrote:Darkstar Wrote:So...why doesn't god also use shock tactics (perhaps even more so) on the insincere?I don't know. Maybe He knows who is worth saving and who is not. Maybe the insincere aren't worth saving for some reason.
I thought this was about who wanted to be saved, but now you are telling me that god decides some people aren't worth showing up for and lets them burn?
Drich Wrote:Darkstar Wrote:Sounds like some other atheist deconversion stories...but a bad dream reconverted you?I did not know God before this dream/vision.
And you didn't know him after because god is unknowable...right?
Drich Wrote:Darkstar Wrote:And for those who want to believe and desperately seek god to find nothing?Unless you fall into the catagory of Romans 9 We are promised to always find something. We may not find what we want but we will find an oppertunity. If we are faith to what we have been given we will be given more.
Darkstar Wrote:Were they doing it wrong?Did they follow the model provided in Luke 11?
Oh, so sincerity isn't the deciding factor in 'finding' god. You have to follow a passage that can be interpreted in multiple ways, and if you find nothing then you must have used the wrong interpretation, even if you claim you didn't. I mean, you can't prove you did it right, so why should anyone...wait...Drich?
Drich Wrote:Darkstar Wrote:I suppose it makes sense. Hitler understood how easily religion [not necessarilly Christianity] could be used to manipulate people, and used it to his advantage.
???so???
I may not have made this clear enough, but my argument is not that Hitler was a faithful Christian, but that he used Christianity (among other things, such as the economy) to rally people against the Jews. Whether or not he was a traditional Christian (it is believed he could have been a deist) is not relevent. He used religion (again, not exclusively) to support his ends, and it worked.
Steven Weinburg Wrote:“Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it, you'd have good people doing good things and evil people doing bad things, but for good people to do bad things, it takes religion.”