RE: Moral men and women will deny women equal rights.
November 14, 2012 at 8:26 am
(This post was last modified: November 14, 2012 at 8:33 am by Greatest I am.)
(November 13, 2012 at 4:15 pm)DoubtVsFaith Wrote: Irrationally unfair treatment of another group of people is bigoted. Explain how it isn't.
And explain how your discrimination is 'positive'. Like I said, what definition of "moral" are you using?
What's moral about treating women as if they're not equal to men?
Men and women's well-being are both equally important.
(November 13, 2012 at 4:09 pm)Greatest I am Wrote: If for some unknown reason man had to begin over again and only one human could be saved, it would have to be a woman and hopefully a pregnant one.
Nature and logic should and does dictate morals and women first is the way to go.
I'm sorry but that 'logic' is fallacious. That's the naturalistic fallacy.
Women are not equal to men. They are superior thanks to their wombs.
As to your last. Denial is not an argument against child.
Adults know this.
Regards
DL
(November 13, 2012 at 5:30 pm)Ben Davis Wrote:(November 13, 2012 at 3:59 pm)Greatest I am Wrote: So if the ship was sinking, you would float away in the life boat and leave women on the ship would you?So you're arguing that it's equal to treat one gender less equally based on an arbitrary assessment? Please, at least form a coherent statement before you start trying to argue it.
That is equality and if you do not put women first then you are not much of a moral man.
Regards
DL
I believe in giving credit where credit is due and real men will do the same.
You seem to think that the weaker and more important should fight for the stronger and less important in terms of family.
Who is the backbone of yours if not the woman?
I know you will say both parents but we both know that that is B S so don't bother. The father has a role but it is in most cases a secondary one.
Regards
DL