(November 18, 2012 at 8:24 pm)Shell B Wrote: A. It was an example. B. This isn't a political debate. C. If you keep calling people dumb and making that many spelling errors, I am going to have to laugh. Sorry. Most browsers have built in spell check, so nationality is no excuse.
I didnt call you dumb!, and I have oftern acknowleged that I make spelling mistakes - and eaven greatfully accepted corrections by other participants of this forum. I use other forums aswell as I write alot on word - so my spellcheck is always set on german language. If you can converse in perfect german - go ahead.
(November 18, 2012 at 8:24 pm)Shell B Wrote: Well, then. Let's stop pretending that them teaching their children their religion is abuse.
If "teaching them their religion" includes teaching them a biggoted worldview, rejection of democracy, pseudoscience and a discriminatory view of others - it is abuse.
(November 18, 2012 at 8:24 pm)Shell B Wrote: Why? What the fuck do you care if they are disregarding people? It's none of your business how they think and feel.
"disriminate those" - therefor.
If you think this only means "thinking" then you are wrong, it might aswell lead to violence and attempt to force their views on others.
(November 18, 2012 at 8:24 pm)Shell B Wrote: Tough shit. Sorry, but homeschooling is not going anywhere. Would you deny a handicapped child homeschooling?
No, I would deny it being tought nonsence. Which is my point!
(November 18, 2012 at 8:24 pm)Shell B Wrote: Oh, so now it is child abuse not to teach a child social skills? What the hell?
I dont know the correct term.
I will rephrase into: Not assuring that your child is a integrated member of the sociaty it lives in, is abuse.
(November 18, 2012 at 7:01 pm)Shell B Wrote: Eh. Wrong. You are redefining a word. I am never, ever a fan of that.
A parent has the obligation to raise it`s child to be a integrated member of sociaty - if it does not it failes this obligation.
If it deliberatly teaches them nonsence it is abusing it`s parental commitment - therefor abusing the child.
(November 18, 2012 at 7:01 pm)Shell B Wrote: Wrong again. What is knowledge is determined by people who write dictionaries. Besides, the ins and outs of a religion is knowledge. It's just not worthy knowledge in your eyes.
Write dictonaries? What?! Do you have an idea who we have and got to have, what we call knowlege?
What is the "ins and outs" of a religion?
(November 18, 2012 at 7:01 pm)Shell B Wrote: Fuuuuuuck that.
So why should parents then be the teachers of their kids, eaven if they teach them nonsence?
Or was that the maturest argument you could give?
(November 18, 2012 at 7:01 pm)Shell B Wrote: You're scaring me.
I cant stand it when people answere in emotional hogwash phrases and believe this to be a valid argument.
If you cant deliver facts to back up a rejection of an argument, dont answere.