RE: Child abuse ?
November 21, 2012 at 3:28 pm
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2012 at 3:30 pm by Something completely different.)
1.
I disagree that homeschooling has a good effect.
2.
I do think that if it is legal (which it is not here) the curiculum should be provided by a educational institution which provides the curriculum for public schools, or it schould be aproved by that educational institution.
3.
If homeschooling is required due to reasons of illness (and other) there should be (and are) legal exemptions for such cases under the conditions mentioned in point 2.
4.
To let people who are not qualified as educators pose as such, is unproductive and it should be illegal for such to teach as legitemate educators.
5.
Raising a child at home and sending a child to school are two different things.
6.
How a parent raises a child is non of my buisness (as long as there is no violation of the law (sexual abuse, violence and other)
7.
A perant should not be able to replace schooleducation unless under circumstances explained in points 2 and 3.
This was my opinion on homeschooling.
Now I do not deny that maybe under sircumstances I contradicted myself in the previos posts.
But you cant deny that I have posted my opinion, which includes all the things above several times, and you did not provide a counter argument.
The only thing you do is insisting that I contradict myself and that I make grammatical mistakes which make my points ununderstandable.
If that case is true, I would like to see my mistakes so I can correct myself.
Now would you provide a argument countering my opinion, or will you insist on making further useless comments centered arround - commenting on how people phrase their opinion.
I disagree that homeschooling has a good effect.
2.
I do think that if it is legal (which it is not here) the curiculum should be provided by a educational institution which provides the curriculum for public schools, or it schould be aproved by that educational institution.
3.
If homeschooling is required due to reasons of illness (and other) there should be (and are) legal exemptions for such cases under the conditions mentioned in point 2.
4.
To let people who are not qualified as educators pose as such, is unproductive and it should be illegal for such to teach as legitemate educators.
5.
Raising a child at home and sending a child to school are two different things.
6.
How a parent raises a child is non of my buisness (as long as there is no violation of the law (sexual abuse, violence and other)
7.
A perant should not be able to replace schooleducation unless under circumstances explained in points 2 and 3.
This was my opinion on homeschooling.
Now I do not deny that maybe under sircumstances I contradicted myself in the previos posts.
But you cant deny that I have posted my opinion, which includes all the things above several times, and you did not provide a counter argument.
The only thing you do is insisting that I contradict myself and that I make grammatical mistakes which make my points ununderstandable.
If that case is true, I would like to see my mistakes so I can correct myself.
Now would you provide a argument countering my opinion, or will you insist on making further useless comments centered arround - commenting on how people phrase their opinion.
