Avoiding questions

[Drich]

You're correct I did not ask that exact question first. I did not ask you what bibles you owned either but hey that is the response given(finally started to answer some questions like a normal human being, fucking amazing ). The Original question I asked was avoided anyway with a bullshit answer.

Actually no, Again a Holy One refers to a direct translation not a contextual translation. Giving you this answer helped me gauge your biblical/Translation knoweledge.
Just FYI because you still do not know the difference between a Holy Bible and a contextually translated version even after it has been explained hows me you are still trying to approach this discussion with the arguement you had in mind when you first asked your question. Why else ignore all of the information I have given you to this point? Is it just so you can claim that I have given you a bullshit answer thus differing the fact that you simply did not understand the answer given?? Or do you still after all of this do not understand a bible can not be technically be called 'Holy' unless it is a direct translation? Thus requiring me to tell you when asked what bible I use, "A Holy One." (Because again, Direct translations are what I personally use.)

Can you see now? The answer I gave was direct, forth comming and on topic. You simply did not have enough information to properly process the answer given, and rather than ask questions you assumed that your understanding of christianity was complete enough to assume that I dismissed your question.

All of this is the underlining point of this thread. There are no crap answers, just crap theology that you all bring to these conversations, that will not allow you to process that answer given.

A title does not make it a bible. I was pointing out that you called it a bible first then said concordance.

Let's see what makes a bible a bible: The word bible is from Koine Greek τὰ βιβλία ta biblia "the books" So a 'Bible' is a collection of Books, more specifically a collection of Koine Greek Books. As the Blue letter bible is such a collection then It does indeed qualify to be called a bible.

If you could only have one holy bible which one would you pick and why?

Blue letter. I gives the KJV along side the Hebrew and Greek.

Can you buy a hard copy of the Blue letter Bible?

Yes, it is a series of books.

Can you please explain what you mean by this "I have to give the greek." I took it as meaning a greek translation. This is why I asked for which version which you have not given.

I orginaly told you I gave minnie scripture from the blue letter because he needs to see the greek, as he does not like any known english transaltion.

Please show me where בהו bohuw means "with out life". As far as I am aware it means empty, void, nothing. Nice try but the use of the word empty(בהו bohuw) in Isa 34:11 is used in a different context. Since you have not proven the "without life" comment your next sentence is irrelevant, "Now as water is not alive we know the Hebrew word is further supported by this passage, and when we put everything in it's proper context", and it does not make any sense.

Bullinger's exhaustive lexicon and concordance. (Their isn't an online version.)

Who's "we"?

Christianity.

Can you substantiate this claim "we know it to mean God created All of the Heavens and a Completed Earth (Rocks Minierals and Water minus dry land and life) as per verse 3 and 4.

Yes and so can you. Just ask any Christian

No we don't. It is quite clear that there is no ocean due to the meaning of בהו bohuw

Wrong. For we are told in the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth. The "EARTH" includes Oceans. Again as God's presents Hovered over the Waters we have been informed that the Oceans were included in the creation of the Earth.

We know Bohuw means devoid of life even outside of the reference material because in the creation of the Earth everything else besides life is still present, otherwise It would not have been the "Earth" God created. What would the earth be without it's single most defining quality? We are known to ourselves as the blue planet because we are 2/3's water.

[What is Gen 2 and Gen 3?

Verse 2 Verse 3 of the book of Genesis.

Answer what? I have not avoided your questions, you have avoided myn.

Then tell me how you are so sure that the earth was devoid of water. We have established your incorrect understanding of the Hebrew, and how it is used. so what other evidence do you have to prove that their was no water after God created the Earth, and before He created Life.

Why are you moving the the goal posts again with your inclusion now of "biblically" for a question?

Not a topical biblical question. As I said in the beginning I reserve the right to ignore any question that I feel are designed to simply be arguementive or designed to derail the topic being discussed. This question does both, for all anyone has to do is go back and re-read the first time I mentioned this, to have an understanding of what I orginally meant.

---

Dear santie,
If you ever think your man enough then bring it. Remeber though I live in the states not some sissy country where citizens can't conceal carry. So you better come straped, because you know I am (btw thanks for the g30 you brought me last year http://www.basspro.com/GLOCK-G30-45-ACP-.../10217982/) Just be sure the Ipad is here on time and all will be good.. If not (GLOCK GLOCK)

Your truly,
Drich

You bought a Glock? I'm so sorry for your wasted purchase.

what do you work for bretta or S&W?

---

OF course - because YOU have no proof to offer

IF you had proof you would gladly post it so that all would see it.
THAT you make fun of the statements simply point to how stupid the claims you make are

I have asked this question 100 times or more when ever one of you asks for proof. Maybe you can answer where you atheist brothers have failed:

What does Proof of God look like? What can be presented that someone who does not want to believe can't simply dismiss as something else? If you can not tell me what proof looks like then how can you ask to see something you would not recognise even if you saw it?