RE: Avoiding questions
December 4, 2012 at 1:36 pm
(This post was last modified: December 4, 2012 at 1:39 pm by Drich.)
(December 4, 2012 at 1:12 pm)apophenia Wrote:(December 4, 2012 at 12:46 pm)Drich Wrote:
So you got nuth-in? except what you as an atheist believe to be true about the various translations of the bible? Not even a hastily googled website that might provide a couple of under scoring points?
It's been less than a week since I told you, in this very thread, that I am a Hindu. And here you are calling me an atheist.
No, you're not incompetent. Tell us more, Mr. Professor.
I assumed that you just said that for the sake of pulling rank, in an attempt to win what you thought would be an easy arguement. Because when you were confronted by traditional Hindu beliefs your arguement folded rather quickly. Just like how quicky you changed the subject about bible translation when confronted to provide "Proof" of your assertions.
It seems as if you wait in the wings for an oppertunity to lash out when you see an Ap-oppertunity for an easy score. I will give you that most of your work is elegantly constructed, but as this post has demonstrated you efforts are of very little substance. You have been asked to 'prove' your assertions acouple different times in acouple different ways, and in each instance you faulter and change the subject.
Just assume from now on, when you make an assertion no matter how elegantly stated i will not take what you have to say at face value. Assume that I will ask you to 'prove' your statement, and be ready to discuss and defend said proof or assume that you have said will be deconstructed, Identified as a trivial assertion and dismissed.
(Which again is why I did not take you seriously as a 'hindu.') Not to say you can't paralell aspects of hinduism and call what you believe to be Hinduism, even though by doing so it is going against Traditional hinduism. (Because people do this in Christianity all of the time)
Just do not expect me to accept your version of the religion like I would the traditional Version. (The same is true for Christianity or any other religion)
(December 4, 2012 at 1:24 pm)DoktorZ Wrote:(November 29, 2012 at 11:57 pm)Drich Wrote: If you ever think your man enough then bring it. Remeber though I live in the states not some sissy country where citizens can't conceal carry. So you better come straped, because you know I am (btw thanks for the g30 you brought me last year http://www.basspro.com/GLOCK-G30-45-ACP-.../10217982/) Just be sure the Ipad is here on time and all will be good.. If not (GLOCK GLOCK)
Just out of curiosity, how do you justify owning deadly weapons as a Christian? Do you think that Jesus of Nazareth would have owned a Glock if he lived today, or would he have condoned such objects? There really isn't much of a reason to own such a thing unless you're seriously considering killing another human being.
Z
Asked and answered from Luke 22:
Be Ready for Trouble
35 Then Jesus said to the apostles, “Remember when I sent you out without money, a bag, or sandals? Did you need anything?”
The apostles said, “No.”
36 Jesus said to them, “But now if you have money or a bag, carry that with you. If you don’t have a sword, sell your coat and buy one. 37 The Scriptures say,
‘He was considered a criminal.’
This Scripture must happen. It was written about me, and it is happening now.”
38 The followers said, “Look, Lord, here are two swords.”
Jesus said to them, “That’s enough.”[d]
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?sea...ersion=ERV