RE: Would you be an atheist if science and reason wasn't supportive of atheism?
December 5, 2012 at 12:33 pm
(December 5, 2012 at 10:09 am)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: [inability to take joke]
No citations and making an extraordinary claim.
Yeah, thank you. You make me wanna speak in my gabagool Italian accent again.
[/inability to take joke]
Quote:Fuck probability?Way to miss the point. OK, I'll spell it out for you; probability calculations are irrelevant when talking about things that have demonstrably happened. The probability for something which has happened is 1. Because it's already happened. Probability can be ignored in favour of factual occurences.
Your credibility just shot down faster than that thing that shoots down real fast.
How about let's not fuck probability because we live in the real world where certainty ain't easy to come by eh?
By the way, if you find me less credible, I must be doing something right.
Sum ergo sum