Avoiding questions

[Angrboda]

You're just spinning your wheels, Drich. None of that explains why I should take those instances of tohu which do support the argument, instead of using one of those examples which does not support the argument. And your response is to simply repeat the same flawed argument. It doesn't get better with repetition. (Although it's a typically Christian form of argument; if you can't persuade with reason, just try to shout them down. It works on Fox News.) Explain why I should guide my interpretation of the use of tohu in the tohu and bohu couplet by the one usage (function, clearly attested in the text) instead of the other usage (form, also clearly attested in the text). Until you provide some justification for doing so, there's nothing more to be said.


(I will also point out that there are a lot of bare assertions and weasel words in this author's "word study" [for example, "tohu and bohu always appear..." - really? two examples is enough to justify an 'always'?])