RE: History of christian morals in the family
December 8, 2012 at 3:57 am
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2012 at 4:05 am by Aractus.)
In the 70's we knew a lot less about hypnosis than we do now. Worse still, untrained psychologists routinely used the treatment with little to no knowledge about how to correctly use it. To some extent this still happens today! It does reflect upon psychiatry since we don't see hypnotherapy as that it should only be administered by someone specially trained. Worse still the psychologist could be conducting their own experiments with little to no regard for the actual health and wellbeing of their patient. David Reimer had this unfortunate fate when he was an innocent infant and the psychologist decided to impose his pet theory upon the boy's life. Both that example and your example show callas disregard or at the very least extreme negligence by those practising in the field of psychiatry (even if they aren't properly qualified to do so) and the harm that it can bring about.
And this is exactly the problem with hypnosis (and specifically hypnotherapy). The fact is that any psychologist can use hypnotherapy, and they don't need any training at all in hypnosis! You get some trumped-up psychologist with no idea what he's doing, and how to use hypnosis correctly, and all of a sudden he believes he's discovered that his patients have all been abused by their parents. Incredible the harm that can be caused by impoper care given by those who should know much better. Another example might be Chopper - his mum was a devout SDA. He claims his father beat him as a child and that he was routinely given EST as a child. It is little wonder that someone with mild autism who is severely dyslexic would turn to a life of crime after an upbringing like his. These days we know much more about autism and EST, doesn't change the fact that he was (allegedly) given improper care as a child. Of course he could have made the whole story up for all we know, Chop is known to do that. Does that reflect upon his mum's religion? I don't think so, I think it just exemplifies the stigmas present in secular society.
A lot was unknown about AIDS at the time. It's good to hear that he agreed to tell his parents, it would have been heartbreaking for them to know it, but it's much better then having them believe a lie.
I'm sorry but that's a fucking pathetic cop-out. Someone I knew not long ago had a live-in girlfriend and a 2nd girlfriend on the side - I did what any sensible level-headed responsible self-respecting adult would do - I told the 2nd girlfriend the truth. I would have told the other one too, but I never saw her that particular year at all. He was fucking furious at me, I was just like "whatever, not my problem, you made the situation deal with it". How the f. people live with themselves knowing that a person is cheating on their partner and not telling that person's partner is beyond me. It's pathetic. It certainly doesn't reflect upon Christian morality, it reflects upon the secular view to "mind your own business".
It's a sad story, with a sad ending. Your grandparents could have spared their daughter-in-law a lot of pain and suffering by telling her the truth when they knew it. Why they felt his wife didn't have a right to know is totally beyond me.