Muhammad the Greatest: A Comparative Study

[Gooders1002]

What is this challenge you are referring to and it is hard to pick it out of all the bullshit. Want to state is a clear and unambiguous question? Or is that to difficult.

Response: Truly entertaining. Afer ducking and dodging the challenge, you now wnat to pretend that you don't know what the challenge is. A drowning man clutching at straws I see.

The challenge is:

"It is humanly impossible for a person/s to inspire enough people to follow him/her to conquer a nation by using humanmande speech/literature that goes against the likes and beliefs of those people."

This is the miracle of Muhammad. For the challenge proves that it is humanly impossible to use any speech or literature that goes against the majority and is invented by a person/s, to inspire enough followers amongst them to conquer a nation. The skeptic still disagrees? Then take the challenge and prove differently. Try using a speech or literature that does not agree with the likes of a majority of people that is an invention by a person/s. Then use that very same speech to inspire them to conquer a nation and see what happens. The challenge can even be simplified by asking a skeptic to just conquer the street that he or she lives on and see what happens. Yet the person will fail and fail miserably. No person will come close to achieving the challenge. Any individual, when taking the challenge, will have a first-hand eyewitness account from experience and observation that such an act is humanly impossible and that is when the person will learn the miracle of Muhammad. Why? The reason is because Muhammad used the Qur'an to inspire enough followers to conquer a nation in the same fashion. So if it is humanly impossible to use speech or literature that goes against the likes of the masses to inspire them to follow a person/s and conquer a nation, yet Muhammad used the Qur'an to do just that, then what does that mean? That means that the Qur'an that Muhammad used is not the invention of any human but must come from a higher power and authority greater than humans, and that is Allah. Do the skeptics still disagree? Then take the challenge and prove differently. When the challengers fail, because they will, this will help to demonstrate that the Qur’an is of divine origin as proven by the scientific method itself because it provides a hands-on eyewitness account that producing something like the Qur’an is humanly impossible. If you read this, and you yourself disagrees, then take the challenge and prove differently.

Nope its not humanly impossible to inspire enough people to follow him/her to conquer a nation by using human made speech/literature that goes against the likes and beliefs of those people.
You just have to have a silver tough and have a gullible enough audience and they will follow you like sheep, its about mind manipulation and you can get almost anybody to believe anything Pen and Teller/Darren Brown do it often, as well as con men as a species we are incredibly gullible and the less intelligent you are the most gullible you are.
Why do you think religion focus on the kids, it's mental manipulation and you were manipulated to be closed minded from the day you could understand words, also less intelligent people back than are a lot easier to manipulate on mass. Hitler was great at manipulation as is all dictators. If Mohammed existed he probably was a great con man (with willing/unknowing accomplices who were literate) because he was also a merchant and there good with silver tongues in Arab countries.