(December 9, 2012 at 8:22 pm)Al-Fatihah Wrote: Response: And if asked of what proof you have that Hitler or any of the people answered the challenge, your answer is "because a book says so", which any reasonable person can see is not proof. For saying so is not proof that it is so.
Furthermore, such evidence is hearssay, while the Qur'an challenge relies on a hands-on eyewitness account as evidence, , because anyone who takes the challenge will fail and not come close to answering it. And since it is clearly humanly impossible to use human-made speech/literature to achieve the act, then that means that the Qur'an that Muhammad used to inspire enough followers to conquer a nation was not the invention of any human/s, but from one who has greater power and authority than humans, and that is Allah.
A hands-on eyewitness account is more credible than hearsay. Thus your argument fails.
Says the man who just killed his own argument.
I quote historians and many, many hands-on eyewitnesses, including men who still live to this day who witnessed Hitler's rise to power. You only quote a book. Which by your own rules is not evidence. However, you have no hands-on eyewitnesses that you can bring to bear; nobody from that time period still exists who witnessed such a thing.
So, thank you kindly for destroying your own argument, saves me the trouble. :]
