(December 9, 2012 at 8:25 pm)Creed of Heresy Wrote: Says the man who just killed his own argument.
I quote historians and many, many hands-on eyewitnesses, including men who still live to this day who witnessed Hitler's rise to power. You only quote a book. Which by your own rules is not evidence. However, you have no hands-on eyewitnesses that you can bring to bear; nobody from that time period still exists who witnessed such a thing.
So, thank you kindly for destroying your own argument, saves me the trouble. :]
Response: Yet if asked how you know that these historians were eyewitnesses, your answer is "because they said so", thus you debunked yourself again. For it still relies on hearsay that the eyewitness were actually eyewitness.
The qur'an challenge on the other hand, provides a hands on-eyewitness account that inspiring enough followers to conquer a nation, or just the street you live on, by using human-made speech/literature that goes against what the people want is humanly impossible, because anyone who takes the challenge will fail and not come close to answering it. And since it is clearly humanly impossible to use human-made speech/literature to achieve the act, then that means that the Qur'an that Muhammad used to inspire enough followers to conquer a nation was not the invention of any human/s, but from one who has greater power and authority than humans, and that is Allah. Debunked as usual.
